Designs That Work
Very Cold Climate
The Basic House - Energy Analysis Overview
An energy analysis was done for the house plan to examine the energy
consumption of the building. With any energy analysis a start point for
comparison is required.
The Building America Benchmark Definition Version 2005 along with
recent revisions was used as a template for performance evaluation between
the advanced building system (Prototype) and the reference building system
(Benchmark). The Benchmark Definition requires hourly building energy
simulation.
The Building America Benchmark Protocol is generally consistent with
mid 1990’s house construction. As apposed to other rating performance
systems, the Building America Benchmark includes not only heating, cooling
and hot water, (which accounts for roughly 50% of total energy consumption
of the home), but also energy consumption from lighting, appliances, and
other miscellaneous loads.
The following table highlights the differences between the Building
America Benchmark House design characteristics and the Prototype design
characteristics that were incorporated into this house design.
| |
Benchmark |
Prototype |
| Building Enclosure |
R-21, 16” oc + R-3 Sheathed Walls |
R-28 Rigid Foam with Interior
Framing |
|
R-35 Roof Insulation |
R-42 Cathedral Ceiling |
|
Low E Windows (U=0.39, SHGC=0.32) |
Low E Windows (U=0.33, SHGC=0.3) |
|
R-18 Basement Insulation |
R-33 Floor on Pier Foundation |
|
BM Airtightness (~5”/100 sf) |
BSC BA Airtightness (2.5 ins/100 sf) |
| Mechanical |
80% AFUE Gas Boiler |
Combo System |
| |
R-5 Ducts, 15% Leakage |
85% AFUE Hot Water Heater |
| |
0.54 EF Gas Tank Hot Water |
Baseboard Heaters |
| |
ASHRAE 62.2 Exhaust Fan |
ASHRAE 62.2 Ventilation by HRV |
| Appliances and Lights |
Incandescent Lighting |
Fluorescent Lighting |
| |
Regular Appliances |
ENERGY STAR Appliances |
The simulation program used to run the energy model was EnergyGaugeUSA
version 2.42 from the Florida Solar Energy Center.
The areas of consideration fall under three main categories, the
Building Enclosure, Mechanical Systems, and Appliances and Lights. A
parametric whole house energy analysis was done for the case study house
design to illustrate the relative importance of the upgrade strategies in
each of the three main areas.
Table 1: Parametric Analysis Results
 Note that the estimated cost
of change column is a net change, giving credit back for the replaced
components. For example, the Benchmark mechanical system includes standard
duct installation, standard efficiency heat pump, and hot water heater.
Crediting the standard system, the high efficiency system with more air
tight ducting and higher efficiency water heater would add $1000 over the
cost of the standard equipment.

Figure 4: Total Source Energy Consumption Reduction
The case study model design achieved a whole house 33.1% energy
reduction when compared to the Building America Benchmark.


On the basis of BTU/sf/yr of site energy, the above calculations yield
the following:

Note that the “Prototype Savings” is source energy savings, whereas the
energy use per square foot is site energy, hence the difference in
savings.

Figure 4: Building Section
 |
 |
|
Drainage
|
Air Barrier
|
 |
 |
|
Vapor Management |
Thermal Resistance |
|