Designs That Work
Mixed-Humid Climate
The Basic House - Energy Analysis Overview
An energy analysis was done for the house plan to examine the energy
consumption of the building. With any energy analysis a start point for
comparison is required.
The Building America Benchmark Definition Version 2005 along with
recent revisions was used as a template for performance evaluation between
the advanced building system (Prototype) and the reference building system
(Benchmark). The Benchmark Definition requires hourly building energy
simulation.
The Building America Benchmark Protocol is generally consistent with
mid 1990’s house construction. As apposed to other rating performance
systems, the Building America Benchmark includes not only heating, cooling
and hot water, (which accounts for roughly 50% of total energy consumption
of the home), but also energy consumption from lighting, appliances, and
other miscellaneous loads.
The following table highlights the differences between the Building
America Benchmark House design characteristics and the Prototype design
characteristics that were incorporated into this house design.
| |
Benchmark |
Prototype |
| Building Enclosure |
R-13, 16” oc + R-1 Sheathed Walls |
R-19 24” oc + R-5 Sheathed Walls |
| |
R-25 Roof Insulation |
R-38 Attic / R-35 Cathedral Ceiling |
| |
Low E Windows (U=0.58, SHGC=0.58) |
Low E Windows (U=0.33, SHGC=0.28) |
| |
R-9 Crawlspace Insulation |
R-10 Walls on Conditioned Crawl |
| |
BM Airtightness (~5”/100 sf) |
BSC BA Airtightness (2.5 ins/100 sf) |
| Mechanical |
6.8 HSPF ASHP |
8.5 HSPF Air Source Heat Pump |
| |
10 SEER A/C System |
14 SEER Cooling System |
| |
R-5 Ducts 15% Leakage |
Ducts in Conditioned Space |
| |
0.88 EF Electric Tank Hot Water |
0.94 EF Tank Hot Water Heater |
| |
ASHRAE 62.2 Exhaust Fan |
ASHRAE 62.2 Ventilation by FanCycler |
| Appliances and Lights |
Incandescent Lighting |
Fluorescent Lighting |
| |
Regular Appliances |
ENERGY STAR Appliances |
The simulation program used to run the energy model was EnergyGaugeUSA
version 2.42 from the Florida Solar Energy Center.
The areas of consideration fall under three main categories, the
Building Enclosure, Mechanical Systems, and Appliances and Lights. A
parametric whole house energy analysis was done for the case study house
design to illustrate the relative importance of the upgrade strategies in
each of the three main areas.
The case study model design achieved a whole house 27.4% energy
reduction when compared to the Building America Benchmark.
Table 1: Parametric Analysis Results

Note that the estimated cost of change column is a net change, giving
credit back for the replaced components. For example, the Benchmark
mechanical system includes standard duct installation, standard efficiency
heat pump, and hot water heater. Crediting the standard system, the high
efficiency system with more air tight ducting and higher efficiency water
heater would add $1000 over the cost of the standard equipment.

Figure 4: Total Source Energy Consumption Reduction Graph


On the basis of BTU/sf/yr of site energy, the above calculations yield
the following:


Figure 5: Building Section

Drainage |

Air Barrier |

Vapor Management |

Thermal Resistance |
|